The Balance Between Security and Privacy in BKA Powers
The Federal Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe is once again assessing the powers of the Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA) concerning data collection, exchange, and monitoring. This follows a 2016 ruling that deemed parts of the BKA Act unconstitutional, prompting legislative improvements.
The Society for Civil Liberties and various individual plaintiffs argue that the current powers infringe on the fundamental right to informational self-determination. They criticize the extensive data collection and potential for creating comprehensive personal profiles.
Federal Minister of the Interior Nancy Faeser defends the measures as necessary for national security, particularly in combating terrorism and organized crime. The court must weigh the state's security mandate against citizens' rights to privacy, a complex balance that has led to critical scrutiny and calls for clearer regulations.
Observers anticipate that the court might demand further amendments to the BKA Act to ensure it adequately protects individual freedoms.
Related news on that topic:
The press radar on this topic:
BKA Law Judgment: Data Protection Violation?
Federal Constitutional Court: Data collection for terrorism prevention? Karlsruhe decides
Data collection for counter-terrorism? Karlsruhe decides
Welcome!

infobud.news is an AI-driven news aggregator that simplifies global news, offering customizable feeds in all languages for tailored insights into tech, finance, politics, and more. It provides precise, relevant news updates, overcoming conventional search tool limitations. Due to the diversity of news sources, it provides precise and relevant news updates, focusing entirely on the facts without influencing opinion. Read moreExpand