Australia has enacted a groundbreaking law banning social media access for those under 16, sparking a significant debate among tech giants and politicians. The law, which imposes fines of up to 49.5 million AUD for non-compliance, has drawn criticism from platforms like TikTok, Meta, and Snapchat. These companies argue that the law was rushed and lacks detailed enforcement measures, leaving them uncertain about implementation.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese defends the legislation as a necessary step to ensure the safety and well-being of young Australians. He emphasizes the need for children to experience a true childhood, free from the pressures of social media. However, critics, including Green Party Senator Sarah Hanson-Young, see the ban as misguided and overly restrictive.
Australia's move comes amid global discussions on regulating social media usage among minors. Countries like Spain, France, and the UK are considering similar measures, while the US already requires parental consent for under-13s. China has also limited those under 14 to 40 minutes a day on Douyin, its version of TikTok.
Despite the intended protections, the law has raised concerns about its impact on young people's voices and the positive aspects of online engagement. Critics, including Suicide Prevention Australia, warn against overlooking the support and community social media can provide. The debate continues as Australia considers how to balance safety with the benefits of digital connectivity.
