In a move that has sparked widespread criticism, FIFA has awarded the 2034 World Cup to Saudi Arabia. This decision comes amid ongoing concerns about the kingdom's human rights record, including allegations of orchestrating high-profile assassinations such as that of journalist Jamal Khashoggi. Critics, including human rights organizations like Amnesty International, argue that hosting the tournament in Saudi Arabia could endanger lives and further highlight the country's poor human rights practices.
The decision has also drawn international criticism, with some accusing FIFA of prioritizing financial gains over ethical considerations. Under the leadership of Gianni Infantino, FIFA has been described as catering to autocratic regimes, a sentiment echoed in media outlets from FIFA's home regions. The Norwegian Football Federation has openly criticized the decision, while the English FA has sought assurances for the safety of LGBTQ+ fans.
DFB President Bernd Neuendorf supports the decision, arguing that international sporting events can lead to human rights improvements, despite previous experiences in Russia and Qatar that suggest otherwise. Additionally, economic interests, including arms sales, have been cited as motivations behind the support for Saudi Arabia.
Saudi Arabia, facing no competition for the bid, plans extensive infrastructure projects to prepare for the World Cup. The timing of the event is constrained by the Winter Olympics and Ramadan, raising logistical challenges. Meanwhile, European leagues have not yet been consulted about the potential impacts on their schedules.
This controversial decision highlights the ongoing debate over the role of sports in global politics and the ethical responsibilities of international sporting bodies.
