A coalition of nine EU member states, led by Italy's Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and Denmark's Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, is advocating for a reevaluation of migration policies in light of evolving global circumstances. They have called for a 'new interpretation' of the European Convention on Human Rights, particularly in relation to the expulsion of foreign national criminals.
This initiative has sparked a debate about the balance between individual rights and national interests, emphasizing the need to protect citizens from perceived threats posed by migrant criminals. Critics, including experts like Professor Basak Cali, suggest that this push is more political than legal, warning against the potential politicization of the European Court of Human Rights.
The initiative has garnered support from other European leaders who believe it reflects the sentiments of many citizens. However, there are concerns about undermining the court's independence and the implications for human rights.
Prominent figures, including CDU politician Günter Krings, have voiced support for revisiting the Convention, arguing that current rulings hinder effective management of irregular migration. As these discussions unfold, the future of EU migration law and human rights protections hangs in the balance, highlighting the tension between safeguarding national security and upholding fundamental rights.
