Recent tensions between Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) have intensified following military strikes by the United States and Israel on Iranian nuclear facilities. IAEA Chief Rafael Grossi expressed concerns about Iran's potential to resume uranium enrichment within months and questioned claims that the Iranian nuclear program had been set back significantly. In contrast, former US President Donald Trump argued that the strikes had inflicted lasting damage on Iran's nuclear capabilities.
Iranian officials have criticized Grossi and the IAEA, accusing them of bias and malign intentions. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi rejected Grossi's requests to inspect the bombed nuclear sites, framing the request as a pretext for further interference. Tehran's parliament has voted to suspend cooperation with the IAEA, further escalating the diplomatic standoff.
Beyond the immediate conflict, the international community has voiced concern over the security of IAEA personnel. Germany, France, and the UK condemned threats against Grossi, calling for Iran to ensure the safety of IAEA staff and resume constructive dialogue. Meanwhile, the Iranian government has called for recognition of the damages incurred due to the strikes, as well as compensatory measures.
Despite satellite imagery showing increased activity at Iran's Fordo nuclear site post-strikes, experts suggest that Iran is assessing the damage rather than rebuilding. However, the situation remains volatile, with Iran expressing doubts over Israel's adherence to a recently brokered ceasefire. As diplomatic tensions simmer, the potential for renewed negotiations looms, with Western powers urging Iran to engage in serious discussions to avert further escalation.
