Scrutiny and Controversy Over EU Commission Candidates

The upcoming hearings for European Commission candidates are set to commence from November 4 to November 12. During this period, candidates will face parliamentary committees to demonstrate their qualifications and address any potential conflicts of interest. While Ursula von der Leyen is exempt from questioning, the remaining candidates must undergo rigorous scrutiny.

In a significant development, members from the Green and Left groups have expressed dissatisfaction with the process, criticizing the lack of thorough examination. This led to a walkout from the legal affairs committee (JURI), with members arguing that the necessary scrutiny was insufficient. Criticisms were also voiced by figures such as Manon Aubry and Mario Furore, who labeled the process a "farce." They accused larger political factions of rushing the procedure, fearing potential political setbacks.

Despite the protests, JURI Chair İlhan Küçük defended the procedure, emphasizing the demand for more detailed information. The committee had already cleared the conflict of interest declarations of 26 candidates, though the lack of personal testimonies from some raised eyebrows.

The hearings carry significant weight, as past precedents show. In 2019, nominees from Hungary and Romania were rejected at this stage due to unresolved conflicts. The current candidates, including Italy's Raffaele Fitto from the far-right Brothers of Italy party, face similar scrutiny.

The outcome of these hearings will determine if the new Commission can be sworn in by early December, following a plenary vote. As the process unfolds, the Parliament's role in ensuring transparency and accountability remains under the spotlight, reflecting broader political dynamics within the European Union.